The mind of a Philospher Poet
FuriousDreamer
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit FuriousDreamer's Xanga Site!

Name: Ben
Country: United States
State: Please select...
Birthday: 5/19/1978
Gender: Male


Interests: country music, breakdancing, pumping iron, writing songs
Expertise: being pretty


Message: message me


Member Since: 12/27/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
JesusFreak366
lysdueck
criscris007
PeachiPiG
kmckinney872
just_for_you_babe
tiney54
bridge_in_asia
MehneLand
mfertig
bobyliu
AngRingen
charbar627
Irish_Belle
expatiate
juniorhighschool
shuntalicious
Bluesclue99
jennybrusoe
chicagocampusminister
HeMakesMeBeautiful
ScottyE41
megandresch
the_world_forgot
buttercup11882
lilmookie

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Sunday, November 09, 2008

In search of some good return-of-Christ music

Wow, it’s been almost a year since I’ve blogged.

 So I was trying to create a “return of Christ” playlist the other day, because I love to think about His return and the Millennial kingdom and eternity and stuff.  I currently have 1257 Christian songs on my iTunes (I think).  Guess how many I found that have anything to do with these subjects or something related?  26.  And I was definitely stretching some of them.  So basically, less than 2% of my Christian songs have anything to do with the return of Christ or heaven.  Does this seem strange to anyone else?  I like to write songs, and fully 50% of my songs are about these topics.  I already know I’m a bit odd, because I think about heaven and Jesus’ return pretty much every day of my life, but I must admit it really surprised me that there really were that few.  By the way, props go out to the Supertones for having 4 of the 26, twice as many as any other band!  And only from 2 albums!  I won’t go into all the bands that had 0 songs about Jesus’ return.

 One reason I enjoy singing hymns (besides the rich theology they often contain) is that almost every hymn’s 4th verse is all about heaven!  This has been lost on recent music.  I feel like music is often a reflection of where the church is at.  I don’t know.  Maybe we’re just too at home in this world.  But it seems we’ve largely forgotten or ignored our destiny.


Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Fleeces

   So, I’ve thought about this idea of putting out a fleece for God to give you an answer about something.  (Taken from the story of Gideon in the Bible)  The idea is something like, “God, if X happens, then I’ll know you’re telling me to do Y.”

   Now, most people will tell you that this type of thing is categorically invalid.  But I can see a situation in which it might be ok.  Here’s the things that I think have to be true in order for putting out a fleece to be valid:

1) You definitely cannot give a 2-way fleece.  Here’s what I mean, “God, if I get 5 green lights in a row today, I’ll know you want me to date this girl (for example), but if You don’t, then I’ll know you don’t want me to date her.”  We cannot manipulate God into speaking to us.  He is completely free to do whatever He wills.  If He doesn’t answer your fleece (for example, you get 3 green lights, then 2 red lights), it means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!  So first of all, a fleece must be only 1-sided.  If God answers it, it may tell you something.  If not, it tells you nothing at all.  This is a definite prerequisite for a valid fleece.  A 2-sided fleece is an attempt to manipulate God into giving you an answer.

2) The fleece must be clear.  So my above example of traffic lights would not be a good one, because what if it turns green after you already started slowing down?  What if it’s green, but there’s a stopped car in front of you?  etc.  So it needs to be something that’s not based on judgment call.  Also, you should probably not be able to manipulate the result, as you could with a traffic light (i.e. slow down a lot before getting to the light if it’s red, so it will hopefully turn green before you get there, etc).

3) The fleece must have an extremely low probability of happening on any given day.  I would say that 5 red lights does not have a low enough probability of happening.  Examples of fleeces that violate this principle would be: If it rains tomorrow…, if the phone rings in the next half hour…, if somebody gives me a compliment at work…  These kinds of things happen all the time, so they are bad ideas for a fleece.  (At least I hope people sometimes compliment you!)  A good rule of thumb would be something that has never happened to you!  After all, God is just as capable of striking your mailbox with lightning as He is making it rain.

4) The fleece must not be a selfish thing.  For instance, “God, if you let me win $10,000 or more with this scratch-off lotto ticket, I’ll know you want me to quit and take that other job.”  I don’t think God is really in the business of answering people’s selfish prayers to get rich, get advancements, win stuff, etc.

5) Fleeces must be about what we should do, not what will happen.  God is the One Who knows the future, and He doesn’t often share that information with His creatures, outside of Biblical prophecy.  Bad fleeces would be, “If X happens, I will know my sister will get better.”  “If X happens, then this is the person I will eventually marry.”  Etc.  It would be better to say, “If X happens, I’ll know You want me to try such-and-such medical treatment, continue to date this person, etc.”  It’s asking God about what we should do, not what will happen if we do that thing.  So we also can’t tie a particular outcome to our action.  We have a tendency to think, for example, that if God tells me to date the person, it will likely end in marriage.  It certainly won’t be a bad breakup.  But perhaps God wants to teach us something different, that has nothing to do with whether we marry that person or not.  We can’t assume the result of any action God tells us to do.  Sometimes, He may tell us to do something to teach us about failure.

I think if you adhere to these simple rules, there is nothing wrong with putting out a fleece for God.  It’s like saying, “God, I know You’re sovereign, and You don’t have to give me an answer, but if you really wanted to make it clear to me what I should do here, this is one way You could tell me.”

So now some examples of what I think could be good fleeces:

If I’m walking down the street, and a stranger throws a tomato at me, I’ll know You want me to take that job.

If 5 different people mention Reykjavik (the capital of Iceland) today to me in casual conversation, I’ll know you want me to move to Lincoln, Nebraska.

If a squirrel falls out of a tree today and smacks into the sidewalk right in front of me and dies, I’ll know you want me to break up with my boyfriend.

If I pass a man carrying a Greyhound dog on his shoulders on my way to work…

Now, you could throw 2 fleeces, for instance, the Reykjavik thing means you move, and the squirrel thing means you don’t move.  This is not the same as a double-sided fleece, because if neither happens, you still know nothing.  And they both follow all the other rules.

Hoping a stranger throws a tomato at you today,

FuriousDreamer


Friday, November 02, 2007

Currently Reading
To Be Told: Know Your Story, Shape Your Future
By Dan B. Allender
see related

Twisting English

        One thing I find strange is when people twist English words to make them mean what they never meant.  I’ll give some examples.  “Success”.  To succeed means to accomplish the goal you set out to achieve.  But people always try to define it as just doing your best.  To agree that this is an acceptable definition, we would also have to agree that an acceptable definition for “win” is to “just show up and try hard”.

        Another word that people try to redefine is “Religion”.  How many times have I heard people say something like, “I don’t have a religion, I have a relationship”?  A religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when a supernatural agent is involved.  Do they mean they don’t have a set of beliefs about these things?  They try to define “religion” as “empty ritual”.  But that is exactly why we have two different words in the English language—religion and ritual—because they’re not the same thing.

Wishing you a wonderful penguin,
FuriousDreamer


Sunday, October 21, 2007

Currently Listening
Sea of Faces
By Kutless
see related

Local church?

   So I know my company is fond of saying, “We’re not a church.”  And I understand the desire not to offend pastors and such or get on their bad side.  But I guess I just have a different ecclesiology than most people.  I believe in the universal church that consists of all believers in Jesus.  So wherever believers are together, you have the church.  I don’t see this idea of the “local church” in the Scripture that many people talk about.  I’m not sure exactly what they mean by that and what distinguishes it from the church at large.  I don’t know that God makes those distinctions.  Believers are believers.  Certainly He sets some as shepherds over others, as is obvious from I Peter 5, but I really don’t think that He probably honors the divisions and groupings that we set up between ourselves.  What is it anyway that people mean when they say, “We aren’t a church?”  Since I have this view of the universal church, I also don’t think a pastor-type person who interprets the Scripture for a congregation is necessary to have a thriving local body of believers.  People can study for themselves and teach each other under more of a discipleship model.

 

Any thoughts?

FuriousDreamer


Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Currently Reading
Impeachable Offense (End of State)
By Neesa Hart
see related

Generation vs. Race

  Sometimes I talk about my church in Florida.  I really loved that church when I went there.  It was young and vibrant.  But when I talk about it, and mention that the average age is probably around 30, if not younger, sometimes people have a problem with that.  I've heard people make the accusation that it's either sinful, unbliblical, or at least not a good thing, to have a church that doesn't really have any old people in it.  (My church did have a few, but they were just overwhelmed by the numbers of 20-somethings.)  They argue that younger people need to be interacting with older people.
   I think their argument is worth considering, at least.  But what gets me, though, is that the same people who think this way, that we need to have young and old in the same church, don't see a need to have blacks and whites in the same church.  Division along generational lines is considered wrong, but division along racial lines is considered contextualization.  That seems like a double standard to me.  Either division is wrong period, or it's ok either way.
   Here's where I'd like your input.  I would argue that I have a lot more in common with a 20-something black man than I do a white man my grandfather's age.  Culturally, I'm a lot closer to 20-something Americans than I am to 60-something Americans, whatever their race.  For instance, when talking to older people I generally run out of things to talk about pretty quickly, unless I want to hear them reminisce about events that predate me or complain about their bodily ailments.  But conversation with someone my own age is easier.  There's just a lot more in common we can talk about, and our stage of life is more similar, as is our worldview.
   What do you think?  Do you have more in common culturally with people your own age of a different race, or people of your own race of your grandparents' age?

FuriousDreamer



Next 5 >>